AIFluencyThe AI Fluency Company
Measure your team
Free · about 11 minutes · no signup

How good are you with AI, really?

Fifteen scenarios, scored on judgment rather than on how much you use AI. You will see where you stand, what your ceiling is, and the one dimension that moves you fastest.

No account. No email to see your score.

Illustrative. Your own figure appears at the end.
You scored2.8Exploring
Your potential3.4Applied

Closing your weakest dimension is worth more than improving all five a little. The result page names which one and by how much.

Free.

The assessment costs nothing and asks for nothing. No account, no card, no email to see your result. You get your score whether or not you ever speak to us.

Independent.

The companies building AI models cannot credibly grade how much you rely on their products. Measurement has to come from somewhere that does not sell you the tool.

Measurement-based.

Five fixed dimensions, scored one to four against a published rubric. Same questions, same scale, same scoring for everyone. How an answer becomes a score is written down in full; the answer key itself goes to reviewers on request rather than onto this page, because a key you have read is a score you chose.

McKinsey now calls AI fluency the next foundation of US economic competitiveness, and defines it as knowing when and how to use AI, and then how to verify and improve the results.

McKinsey, August 2026.
For organizations

An individual score is interesting. Two hundred of them tell you where to spend.

The same fifteen scenarios, aggregated by department. You see which teams are strong, where the risk concentrates, and what to do about it.

AwarenessInstructionVerificationGovernanceIntegration
Sales33223
Operations32232
Finance22132
Engineering44334
Marketing33223

Verification carries the lowest average across the organization, at 2.0 of 4. That is the column to act on.

Illustrative figures, not a real organization.

What it measures

Five dimensions, weighted equally. This is the whole rubric.

01

Awareness

Knowing where AI helps, where it fails, and when not to use it.

02

Instruction

Directing AI clearly with context, constraints, and intent.

03

Verification

Checking AI output for accuracy before relying on it.

04

Governance

Using AI within policy, privacy, and risk boundaries.

05

Integration

Building AI into real workflows so gains compound.

How the scoring works, and what it will not claim →

A real question from the assessment

No trick questions and no obviously-right answer. Every option is something a competent person might genuinely choose.

You're on a deadline. An AI tool gives you a specific market figure you need for a slide and cites a named, real-looking source. You have 20 minutes left.

What actually demonstrates good judgment here?

Verify every claim across the whole deck before you send any part of it on.
Cut the figure and rework the slide around it so that you do not need one.
Use it. It cites a named source, and you cannot chase every number on deadline.
Spend the 20 minutes on this one figure, because fabricated citations are common.

Each answer maps to a level. The highest-scoring answer is often not the most cautious or the most thorough one.

Find out where you stand.