About 15 hours of live, hands-on training a year for each person in a training group, built on their own work and measured every quarter. Each quarter, a training group of up to 30 people you choose works on its two weakest dimensions: two 90-minute hands-on workshops a few weeks apart, then a 45-minute practice clinic on real tasks from their own jobs. A re-score at 90 days picks the next focus. See a sample curriculum.
One full quarter, any size
Fully credited against a first-year annual contract signed within 30 days after the pilot’s re-score results are delivered.
Start with a pilotUnder 25 people assessed
$1,250 a month, billed monthly. One flat price. One training group included.
Talk to us25 or more people assessed
Billed monthly. One training group included.
Talk to usEach additional training group of up to 30 people: $2,500 a quarter, which is $10,000 a year. The same full cycle as the included group: two workshops and a practice clinic every quarter.
Annual contracts are billed monthly. Examples at 25 or more people assessed: 25 people $20,500 a year ($1,708 a month) · 60 people $24,000 a year ($2,000 a month) · 100 people $28,000 a year ($2,333 a month) · 200 people $38,000 a year ($3,167 a month). Every price covers assessing everyone you count and one training group of up to 30 people; the training hours are for each person in a group. Each additional group is $2,500 a quarter.
Scores describe how people answered fifteen scenarios against a scoring key that is withheld from the public and has not yet been independently validated. What is and is not established.
Everyone you are counting takes the fifteen-scenario assessment. One score per person, across five dimensions.
The leadership view ranks the five dimensions by department and names the two furthest below Applied. Where a tie leaves the choice unclear, it says so and you choose. When no dimension is below Applied, training still continues each quarter on the team’s two lowest dimensions, at the Applied level, working toward Fluent.
Each quarter, a training group of up to 30 people you choose works on those dimensions: two 90-minute hands-on workshops a few weeks apart, then a 45-minute practice clinic on real tasks from their own jobs.
The same questions again at 90 days, reported per dimension, and the re-score picks the next quarter’s focus. A figure is not shown when too few people have been measured for the number to mean anything.
The training cycle and the leadership session are part of the price, not add-ons. A re-score shows whether the answers changed. It cannot show what caused the change.
None of these is a basis for a decision about someone’s job. What this score is not.
Up to 30 people, drawn from the teams the dashboard shows furthest behind on the focus dimensions, chosen by you. It is not training for the whole workforce. Leaders choose who is in each group. The dashboard shows which teams are furthest behind on the focus dimensions; it never picks people.
Where more than 30 people need the training at once, each additional group is $2,500 a quarter ($10,000 a year), with the same full cycle as the included group: two workshops and a practice clinic every quarter.
The champion program ($3,000 one-time) is a half-day session that prepares champions to reinforce the training between our workshops and carry it to teams in other time zones, using a facilitator kit built on the organization’s own workflows, kept current as Claude changes for as long as the subscription runs.
Verification and Governance are the two dimensions furthest below Applied across the organization, so the training focuses on them.
Illustrative figures.
One-to-one coaching is a separate purchase. Monthly office hours with a practitioner are included; individual coaching beyond them is booked from the practitioner on The AI Fluency Coaching Hub, at their own rate. AIFluency operates that Hub and earns a fee on bookings through it, so we do sell help closing the gaps this measures.
An engineering workshop for technical teams is priced separately, from $3,500.
What it is independent of is the model vendors. None of them sets the questions, the level mappings or the scores here.